|
|
|
|
전경자 ( June Kyung-Ja ) - 순천향대학교 간호학과
최은숙 ( Choi Eun-Sook ) - 경북대학교 간호대학 간호학과
김재영 ( Kim Jae-Young ) - U.S.A. Harvard School of Public Health
최윤영 ( Choi Yun-Young ) - 백석대학교 사회복지학부
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: A national long-term care system for elderly and the disabled has its unique evolution in each country. Japan, Germany and the United States may be the typical examples of respective social insurance system. This paper reviews the counterpart examples of Japan, Germany and the United States and looks at their accumulated long-term care system experiences and personal care system under workers’ compensation.
Methods: Literature review and website searching were conducted. Key words as ‘workers’ compensation insurance’, ‘personal care benefit’ and ‘long term care’ were used in searching the related literatures.
Results: Though the personal care benefit under current Workers’Compensation in Korea is very similar to Japan’s, the long-term care system of Korea is not as well established. Germany and the United States have the provision of personal care benefit for injured workers within long term care system.
Conclusions: We recommend some key issues to take into account for improving personal care benefit system in workers’ compensation in Korea as follows: providing a comprehensive coverage through the linkage of long term care, introducing an assessment & evaluation system for the appropriate benefits, establishing insurer’s role for quality management of personal care service, and developing a policy for family caregivers.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
산업재해보상보험, 간병급여, 장기요양
Workers’ compensation insurance, Personal care benefit, Long term care
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
|